Starting September 18, 2026, green card applicants in the United States face a dramatically expanded public charge review — one that could weigh a far broader range of government benefits against them when USCIS decides whether to approve their applications for permanent residence.
The Final Rule: What Changed
On July 16, 2026, DHS announced a final rule that rescinds the 2022 Biden-era public charge inadmissibility regulations.
The final rule was formally published in the Federal Register on July 20, 2026, and goes into effect on September 18, 2026.
USCIS is issuing updated guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual explaining how the agency will determine whether an alien applying for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident is likely at any time to become a public charge.
The updated guidance aligns with congressional intent that aliens in the United States be self-sufficient and not dependent on taxpayer-funded government benefits.
The shift is significant.
Starting September 18, 2026, USCIS officers will no longer be limited to counting cash assistance and long-term institutionalization — they are directed to weigh all pertinent facts, case by case, when deciding whether a green card applicant is likely to become a public charge.
A Broader Net for Benefits Scrutiny
Under the 2022 rule that is being rescinded,
only two things counted: cash assistance for purposes of income maintenance and institutionalization at government expense.
The new framework changes that calculus substantially.
To make public charge inadmissibility determinations, USCIS officers will consider the five statutory factors and any other factor relevant to assessing the alien's likelihood at any time of becoming a public charge, including the alien's receipt of means-tested public benefits, such as cash assistance for income maintenance, housing assistance, food stamps, financial aid for college, or any other similar benefit.
Receipt of any means-tested public benefit may be considered in a public charge determination, and applications for, approval for, or certification to receive means-tested benefits may also be considered.
There is an important temporal distinction, however.
For means-tested public benefits received before September 18, 2026, USCIS will only consider the alien's receipt of public cash assistance for income maintenance and long-term institutionalization at the government's expense.
For means-tested public benefits received on or after September 18, 2026, USCIS will consider any and all benefits.
How Officers Will Decide
Under the new policy, USCIS generally considers a person likely to become a public charge if that individual is more likely than not to become dependent on the government to meet basic needs, such as food, shelter, or healthcare. Officers will make this prospective determination based on the totality of the applicant's circumstances.
Congress has specified that USCIS officers must consider five statutory factors when making public charge inadmissibility determinations. These five factors are an alien's age; health; family status; assets, resources, and financial status; and education and skills.
Critically,
no single factor — including receipt of a means-tested benefit — automatically determines the outcome of a public charge decision.
However, failure to submit a sufficient affidavit of support when one is required can independently result in a public charge finding. Even a sufficient affidavit of support does not, by itself, guarantee a favorable determination.
The guidance also allows adjudicators to consider the means-tested benefits that certain family members of applicants receive, even where the applicant doesn't receive benefits themselves.
That said,
the public charge test looks at the applicant's own use of benefits — it does not look at benefits used by a U.S. citizen child in the same home.
Revised Form I-485: A Hard Cutoff
Alongside the new public charge framework,
on September 18, 2026, USCIS will publish a revised edition of Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (edition date: 09/18/26), revised to align with the recently announced Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility Final Rule.
USCIS confirmed that there will be no grace period for transitioning to the new form. Applicants who submit an outdated edition on or after September 18, 2026, will have their applications rejected.
Unlike some prior USCIS form updates, there will be no overlap period allowing applicants to use either edition.
A rejected I-485 is not a delayed I-485 — it is returned unfiled.
That distinction matters because a rejected application does not preserve a filing date or priority date, and could result in significant delays.
Because there will be no grace period, USCIS is providing a preview version of the 09/18/26 edition of Form I-485 and its instructions.
However,
applicants should not file the 09/18/26 edition of Form I-485 before September 18, 2026 — USCIS will only accept that edition if it is postmarked or electronically submitted on or after September 18.
Who Is Affected — and Who Is Exempt
The rule can affect both family-based and employment-based adjustment cases. An excellent job, an advanced degree, or an approved immigrant petition does not by itself remove public charge review when the statutory ground applies.
Congress has exempted many humanitarian categories, including refugees, asylees, VAWA self-petitioners, T and U visa holders, Special Immigrant Juveniles, and TPS applicants, among others.
The public charge test applies to people applying for a visa, admission, or adjustment of status. It does not take permanent residence away from current green card holders.
Public Charge Bonds: A Safety Valve
The new guidance also revives detailed procedures for public charge bonds.
If USCIS determines that a person is inadmissible solely because it believes that they are likely to become a public charge, the officer may give them the opportunity to post a public charge bond. This bond serves as a financial guarantee. USCIS will determine the amount by considering the amount of government assistance the person could receive over the next five years.
The regulation establishes a minimum bond amount of $1,000, but USCIS has discretion to require a substantially higher amount based on the circumstances of the case.
Potential Legal Challenges
The legal landscape remains fluid.
Several organizations plan to challenge this change in court.
A Nevada federal court has already enjoined the Department of State from applying the 75-country pause to two individual plaintiffs in Sangster v. Rubio, and a broader challenge, CLINIC v. Rubio, is pending in the Southern District of New York.
Legal challenges to the rule are possible, as they have been with every recent version of the public charge policy. Court decisions could delay, block, or modify the rule.
What Applicants Should Do Now
For those planning to file Form I-485, timing is everything.
The filing date decides which rule applies to a case. File before September 18, 2026, and the case is judged under the current rule. File on or after that date, and the new rule applies instead.
However,
for pending applications, USCIS can still consider the means-tested benefits that are received after September 18, 2026 as part of the "totality of the circumstances."
Applicants filing on or near the September 18 deadline should take several practical steps:
- Verify the correct form edition.
- Prepare comprehensive documentation.
- Consult an immigration attorney.
The September 18, 2026, policy represents a significant expansion of the public benefits and financial information USCIS may consider in public charge determinations for adjustment applicants.
As the effective date approaches, applicants and their representatives must prepare carefully — both to ensure they use the correct form and to build the strongest possible case under a framework that gives officers considerably more discretion than before.
---
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For guidance on how the new public charge rule may affect your specific immigration case, please consult with an experienced immigration attorney.